Scientific Bulletin of Mukachevo State University. Series “Economics”

Vol. 12, No. 2, 2025 30.06.2025 open access Open access

Modelling economic productivity of Ukraine in the context of military challenges

Tetiana Shtal, Olena Butenko, Olena Kot, Viktoria Kozub, Valerii Malakhov

DOI https://doi.org/10.52566/msu-econ2.2025.107 Pages 107 –120 Views 1,424 Views

Abstract

Military challenges have transformed the economy of Ukraine, stipulating the necessity of revaluating the sources of its productivity. An attempt was made to model the impact of these factors on Ukraine’s GDP using the Cobb-Douglas production function and the Solow residual. Statistical data for 2014-2024 were analysed, regression analysis was performed to determine the relationship between the main economic variables and the elasticity of capital and labour was estimated. The Solow residual was used to estimate the technological level of the economy and identify exogenous factors affecting productivity. The results of the study suggest that spending on scientific and technical activities had a negative impact in the short term due to insufficient funding and macroeconomic instability. Military expenditures failed to provide a significant increase in productivity due to their unproductive focus. In contrast, international aid contributed to macroeconomic stability, although failed to stimulate long-term growth. The partial contribution of factors to the formation of the Solow residual made up 27.92% for innovation, 25.95% for military spending and 20.99% for international aid. The model indicated a high R² value (0.96), suggesting its validity in explaining changes in TFP. Recommendations were developed to improve economic productivity of Ukraine, which include improving scientific and technical activity through improved funding for scientific research, rationalising defence spending by integrating military investments into the overall economic strategy, as well as effectively attracting international aid for structural reforms and human capital development. The obtained results can serve as the foundation for shaping economic policies aimed at the country’s post-war recovery

Keywords

Cobb-Douglas production function, employment, international aid, expenditures on scientific and technical activities, Solow residual

References

  1. Babets, I. (2023). Modelling the impact of foreign direct investment on the economy of Ukraine in the conditions of post-war reconstruction. Galician Economic Herald, 1(80), 130-143. doi: 10.33108/galicianvisnyk_tntu2023.01.131.
  2. Bielousova, L.I., Litvinova, I.M., & Bielousov, Y.I. (2022). Rebuilding Ukraine’s economy in the post-war period: Essays. Time Description of Economic Reforms, 2, 6-12. doi: 10.32620/cher.2022.2.01.
  3. Bril, M., & Pyvavar, I. (2022). Instrumental analysis of the impact of economic factors on the level of a country’s economic innovativeness. Development  Management, 21(3), 44-54. doi: 10.57111/devt.20(3).2022.44-54.
  4. Cherkashyna, T. (2019). Cobb-Douglas production function as an instrument of economic growth policy of Ukraine under market reforms. Economy and Society, 20. doi: 10.32782/2524-0072/2019-20-15.
  5. Deineko, L.V., Kushnirenko, O.M., Tsyplytska, O.O., & Gakhovych, N.H. (2022). Consequences of the full-scale military aggression of the Russian Federation for the Ukrainian industryEconomy of Ukraine, 5, 3-25.
  6. Financing of the state budget of Ukraine since the beginning of the full-scale war. (2025). Retrieved from https://mof.gov.ua/uk/news/ukraines_state_budget_financing_since_the_beginning_of_the_full-scale_war-3435.
  7. Global Innovation Index 2024. (2024). GII 2024 results. Retrieved from https://www.wipo.int/web-publications/global-innovation-index-2024/en/gii-2024-results.html.
  8. Hirina, O., Merkt, O., & Zahorodnia, K. (2024). Using economic growth models to justify sustainable development of maritime industry enterprises. Transport Development, 3(22), 7-19. doi: 10.33082/td.2024.3-22.01.
  9. Ivanchenkov, V., Vovk, V., Yermolenko, O., Prusova, G., & Revenko, O. (2024). Innovative factors ensuring strategic changes in sectors of the national economy. Economics of Development, 23(4), 20-37. https://doi.org/10.57111/econ/4.2024.20
  10. Kapustian, V., Mazhara, H., & Fartushnyi, I. (2022). Economic modeling. Kyiv: KPI named after Igor Sikorskyi.
  11. Kenton, W. (2023). Solow residual: Definition, example, vs. TFP. Investopedia. Retrieved from https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/solow-residual.asp.
  12. Makarenko, P., Bielov, O., Makarenko, Yu., Dorohan-Pysarenko, L., & Bezkrovnyi, O. (2023). Dependence of a country’s GDP on the value of physical and human capital and financing of the scientific and technical sector. Financial and Credit Activity: Problems of Theory and Practice, 5(52), 268-282. doi: 10.55643/fcaptp.5.52.2023.4174.
  13. Minfin. (n.d.a). Foreign direct investment (2002-2024). Retrieved from https://index.minfin.com.ua/ua/economy/fdi/.
  14. Minfin. (n.d.b). Gross domestic product (2002-2023). Retrieved from https://index.minfin.com.ua/ua/economy/gdp/.
  15. Ministry of Economy of Ukraine. (2024). Information materials on the state of innovation activity. Retrieved from https://me.gov.ua/documents/detail?lang=uk-ua&id=69b9a9bf-5fbc-4035-8c0f-ac26b853c0eb&title=informatsiinimaterialischodostanuinnovatsiinoidiialnosti.
  16. Momot, V., & Lytvynenko, O. (2023). Modeling changes in the activity of domestic business in wartimeAcademic Review, 2(59), 173-189.
  17. Mykolenko, O. (2025). Developing the scale for measuring SMEs’ performance in times of crisis. Sustainable Development of Economy, 1(52), 5-13. doi: 10.32782/2308-1988/2025-52-1.
  18. National Bank of Ukraine. (2023). Simply about the economy (based on the January 2023 Inflation Report materials). Retrieved from https://bank.gov.ua/ua/news/all/prosto-pro-ekonomiku-na-osnovi-materialiv-inflyatsiynogo-zvitu-za-sichen-2023-roku.
  19. OECD. (2023). Assessing the impact of Russia’s war against Ukraine on Eastern Partner countries. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  20. Ostapenko, A., & Zalevska, D. (2024). Research of complex systems using simulation modeling based on system dynamics. Science and Production, 27, 77-84. doi: 10.31498/2522-9990272024303193.
  21. Pidoricheva, I. (2022). Post-war recovery of Europe: Experience and lessons for UkraineJournal of European Economics, 21(2), 190-207.
  22. Pysarenko, T., et al. (2024). Scientific, scientific-technical, and innovative activity in Ukraine in 2023 (scientific-analytical report). Kyiv: UkrINTEI.
  23. Pysarenko, T., Kvasha, T., Kuranda, T., Musina, L., & Paladchenko, O. (2021). The state of scientific and innovative activity in Ukraine in 2020 (scientific-analytical note). Kyiv: UkrINTEI.
  24. Redko, K.Y., Garnik, O.A., & Lukyanikhin, V.O. (2024). Assessing the impact of innovation potential on economic development: The Ukrainian context. Academic Visions, 32. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.12069688.
  25. Shumska, S.S. (2007). The production function in economic analysis: Theory and practiceEconomy and Forecasting, 2, 138-153.
  26. Sokolova, O. (2022). Simulation of changes in the sectoral structure of Ukraine’s economy. Problems of a Systematic Approach in Economics, 2(82), 54-61. doi: 10.32782/2520-2200/2021-2-7.
  27. Solow residual: Total factor productivity and the U.S. economy. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://rsmus.com/insights/economics/solow-residual.html.
  28. Shtal, T., Polyakova, Y., Proskurnina, N., Dobroskok, I., & Kot, O. (2019). Modeling of Convergence of the Economic System of Ukraine with G20 Countries Based on the Analysis of Structural Changes in Ukrainian Foreign Trade. Journal Of Advanced Research In Law And Economics, 9(6), 2129-2145. doi:10.14505//jarle.v9.6(36).28
  29. State Employment Service. (2023). The situation on the labour market and the activities of the state employment service in January-August 2023. Retrieved from https://old.dcz.gov.ua/sites/default/files/infofiles/08_sytuaciya_na_rp_ta_diyalnist_dsz_2023_0.pdf.
  30. Suntcova, O. (2022). Assessing the impact of financial technologies and virtual assets on a country’s economic growth. Business, Innovations, Management: Problems and Perspectives, 2022, 139-140. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7556751.
  31. Turlakova, S. (2022). Research of mathematical methods and models of long-term industrial developmentEkonomika Promyshlennosti, 4(100), 53-77.
  32. Ukraine military spending/defence budget 1992-2025. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.macrotrends.net/global-metrics/countries/UKR/ukraine/military-spending-defence-budget.
  33. Ukrstat. (n.d.). Employed population by type of economic activity. Retrieved from https://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/operativ/operativ2014/rp/zn_ed/zn_ed_u/zn_ed_2013_u.htm.
  34. Volkova, V., Ohlikh, V., & Trosko, S. (2024). Using the Cobb-Douglas function to analyze economic dynamics. Economic Space, 191, 406-411. doi: 10.32782/2224-6282/191-69.
  35. Zakharchenko, V.I., Kandeeva, V.V., & Oneshko, S.V. (2021). Comprehensive analysis of the state of the main elements of the mechanism of development of the economic potential of the enterprise. Market Economy: Modern Theory and Practice of Management, 20(2(48)), 46-65. doi: 10.18524/2413-9998.2021.2(48).243679.

Suggested citation

Shtal, T., Butenko, O., Kot, O., Kozub, V., & Malakhov, V. (2025). Modelling economic productivity of Ukraine in the context of military challenges. Scientific Bulletin of Mukachevo State University. Series “Economics”, 12(2), 107-120. https://doi.org/10.52566/msu-econ2.2025.107