Scientific Bulletin of Mukachevo State University. Series “Economics”

Vol. 13, No. 1, 2026 01.04.2026 open access Open access

The impact of economic digitalisation on the development of government strategies for youth employment

Maia Chechelashvili, Ana Svanidze, Eduard Kavtidze, Giorgi Lagvilava

DOI https://doi.org/10.52566/msu-econ1.2026.68 Pages 68 –81 Views 182 Views

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of government strategies to promote youth employment in the context of the digital transformation of the economy. The methodological framework included an analysis of statistical data from international organisations, a content analysis of strategic documents, and an online survey of 512 respondents. The study used a comparative approach based on the analysis of the experience of Kazakhstan, the European Union, Ukraine, Georgia, and Moldova. The survey of young professionals revealed statistically significant differences in the level of digital competencies between the countries of the European Union and neighbouring countries: 7.8 points on a 10-point scale in the European Union and 6.3 points in Georgia, Moldova, and Ukraine (U = 4,890, p <0.01), which confirms the existence of a persistent gap in digital training and opportunities for integration into the labour market. The higher average score of digital skills and the share of positive assessments of government support measures in EU countries (62% vs 38%; t(310) = 4.21, p < 0.001; χ² = 24.7, p < 0.001) indicate a synergistic effect of combining advanced digital infrastructure, educational initiatives, and institutional employment support mechanisms. A strong positive correlation has been established between digital skills and employment in the digital sector (rₛ = 0.62, p < 0.001). In the European Union, digital components are integrated into 90% of strategies, institutional support measures, 80%, integration of education and the digital economy, 73%; in Georgia, Moldova, and Ukraine, these indicators are 60, 45, and 33%, respectively, indicating fragmented approaches and barriers, including lack of practical skills, limited access to targeted internships, and poor integration of educational programmes with the digital sectors of the economy. The practical significance lies in substantiating the priority of the systemic development of digital skills, the integration of educational and labour trajectories, and the expansion of grant, subsidy, and psychological support programmes for the development of sustainable youth employment in the digital economy

Keywords

digital literacy; integration into the labour market; post-Soviet space; institutional mechanisms; psychological stability; technological inequality; professional adaptation

References

  1. American Sociological Association. (1997). Code of ethics. Retrieved from https://www.asanet.org.
  2. Aqyl Tech & IT-Aiel. (2025). Retrieved from https://twevent.net.
  3. Asia Pacific Career Development Association. (2025). April 2025 Kazakhstan Report. Retrieved from https://asiapacificcda.org.
  4. Avagianou, A., Kapitsinis, N., Papageorgiou, I., Strand, A.H., & Gialis, S. (2022). Being NEET in youthspaces of the EU South: A post-recession regional perspective. Young, 30(5), 425-454. doi: 10.1177/11033088221086365.
  5. Azar, S.K., Naeim, M., & Arjmand, H. (2025). Socio-cultural erosion and the mental health crisis in Iranian youth: Root causes, challenges, and culturally aligned interventions. Asian Journal of Psychiatry, 103, article number 104350. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2024.104350.
  6. Babin, A., Covalenco, I., & Tutunaru, S. (2023). Digitalization of entrepreneurship capacity building for rural areas of the Republic of Moldova. In Economic growth in the conditions of globalization: International scientific-practical conference, XVIIth edition (pp. 105-122). Chisinau: National Institute for Economic Research. doi: 10.36004/nier.cecg.I.2023.17.11.
  7. Bakry, D.S., Daim, T., Dabic, M., & Yesilada, B. (2024). An evaluation of the effectiveness of innovation ecosystems in facilitating the adoption of sustainable entrepreneurship. Journal of Small Business Management, 62(2), 763-789. doi: 10.1080/00472778.2022.2088775.
  8. Barford, A., Coutts, A., & Sahai, G. (2021). Youth employment in times of COVID: A global review of COVID-19 policy responses to tackle (un)employment and disadvantage among young people. Geneva: International Labour Organization. doi: 10.17863/CAM.89026.
  9. Başol, O., Sevgi, H., & Yalçın, E.C. (2023). The effect of digitalization on youth unemployment for EU countries: Treat or threat? Sustainability, 15(14), article number 11080. doi: 10.3390/su151411080.
  10. Bickauske, D., Kromalcas, S., Simanaviciene, Z., Sergiienko, L., & Baranovska, T. (2021). Digital transformation as a factor of ensuring country competitiveness: Moldova case analysis. Independent Journal of Management & Production, 12(6), 560-583. doi: 10.14807/ijmp.v12i6.1779.
  11. Buitek, E.K., Kaliyeva, S.A., Turginbayeva, A.N., Meldakhanova, M.K., & Shaikh, A.A. (2025). How much does an employer’s attractiveness matter to youth employment? Evidence from a developing country. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 17(1), 258-283. doi: 10.1108/APJBA-02-2023-0086.
  12. Dovgal, E., Dovgal, G., & Ishchenko, M. (2021). Prospects for digitalization of the economy of Ukraine: Opportunities and threats. The Journal of V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Series: International Relations. Economics. Country Studies. Tourism, 13, 78-88. doi: 10.26565/2310-9513-2021-13-08.
  13. El Khatib, M., AlMaeeni, A., & Alkamali, W. (2022). The relation between effective digital program governance and program success. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 12, 1402-1418. doi: 10.4236/ajibm.2022.129078.
  14. Electronic Government of the Republic of Kazakhstan. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://egov.kz.
  15. EU NEIGHBOURS east. (2023). EntreGram4Youth: Ukrainian Ministry of Digital Transformation and EU introduce self-assessment tool for young entrepreneurs. Retrieved from https://euneighbourseast.eu.
  16. European Commission. (n.d.a). The Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI). Retrieved from https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu.
  17. European Commission. (n.d.b). Youth employment support. Retrieved from https://employment-social-affairs.ec.europa.eu.
  18. European Union. (n.d.). Upskilling digital competences and career management skills of disadvantaged youth in Georgia, Armenia and Moldova. Retrieved from https://eufordigital.eu.
  19. Eurostat. (2024). Young people – digital world. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu.
  20. Geza, W., Ngidi, M.S.C., Slotow, R., & Mabhaudhi, T. (2022). The dynamics of youth employment and empowerment in agriculture and rural development in South Africa: A scoping review. Sustainability, 14(9), article number 5041. doi: 10.3390/su14095041.
  21. IBM. (2022). Downloading IBM SPSS Statistics 29. Retrieved from https://www.ibm.com.
  22. Idris, M., & Maikomo, J.M. (2024). Impact of digital economy on youth unemployment in Nigeria. KASU Journal of Economics and Development Studies, 10(2), 141-156.
  23. International Labour Organization. (2022). Global employment trends for youth 2022: Investing in transforming futures for young people. Retrieved from https://www.ilo.org.
  24. International Labour Organization. (2022). Promoting youth employment during COVID-19: A review of policy responses. Retrieved from https://www.ilo.org.
  25. International Telecommunication Union. (2021). Digital development country profile: Georgia. Retrieved from https://www.itu.int.
  26. Janampa, J.C., & Dasgupta, S. (2021). Is the future ready for youth? Youth employment policies for evolving labour markets. Geneva: ILO.
  27. Kruhlov, V. (2021). State policy of labour market transformation: Challenges of the digital age. Scientific Bulletin: Public Administration, 1(7), 140-161. doi: 10.32689/2618-0065-2021-1(7)-140-161.
  28. Liguori, E.W., Muldoon, J., Ogundana, O.M., Lee, Y., & Wilson, G.A. (2024). Charting the future of entrepreneurship: A roadmap for interdisciplinary research and societal impact. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1), article number 2314218. doi: 10.1080/23311975.2024.2314218.
  29. Liotti, G. (2022). Labour market regulation and youth unemployment in the EU-28. Italian Economic Journal, 8(1), 77-103. doi: 10.1007/s40797-021-00154-3.
  30. Madsen, C.Ø., Lindgren, I., & Melin, U. (2022). The accidental caseworker – how digital self-service influences citizens’ administrative burden. Government Information Quarterly, 39(1), article number 101653. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2021.101653.
  31. Ministry of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Development of the Republic of Kazakhstan. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.gov.kz.
  32. Miyamoto, K., & Bashir, S. (2020). Digital skills: Frameworks and programs. Retrieved from https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/entities/publication/18cfa834-c2bf-5286-9510-6dc615e96faf.
  33. Mpofu, F.Y., & Mhlanga, D. (2022). Digital financial inclusion, digital financial services tax and financial inclusion in the fourth industrial revolution era in Africa. Economies, 10(8), article number 184. doi: 10.3390/economies10080184.
  34. OECD. (2023a). Promoting digital business skills in the Republic of Moldova.
    Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org.
  35. OECD. (2023b). Youth digital skills development 2021-2023. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org.
  36. Omarova, A., Niyazov, M., Turekulova, A., Turekulova, D., Mukhambetova, L., & Mukhambetov, Y. (2024). Socio-economic development of youth policy in the context of digital transformation. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 20(1), 197-208. doi: 10.14254/1800-5845/2024.20-1.18.
  37. Osvita.Diia. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://osvita.diia.gov.ua.
  38. Qualtrics LLC. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.qualtrics.com.
  39. Raileanu Szeles, M., & Simionescu, M. (2022). Improving the school-to-work transition for young people by closing the digital divide: Evidence from the EU regions. International Journal of Manpower, 43(7), 1540-1555. doi: 10.1108/IJM-03-2021-0190.
  40. Reed, J., & Dunn, C. (2025). Postdigital young people’s rights: A critical perspective on the UK government’s guidance to ban phones in England’s schools. Postdigital Science and Education, 7, 376-385. doi: 10.1007/s42438-024-00464-6.
  41. Regional United Nations Group for Europe and Central Asia on Digital Transformation. (2022). Supporting digital transformation in Europe and Central Asia. Retrieved from https://uneuropecentralasia.org.
  42. Ridwan, M., Fiodian, V.Y., Religia, Y., & Hardiana, S.R. (2025). Investigating the effect of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in shaping digital entrepreneurial intention: The mediating role of self-efficacy. Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 19(3), 190-207. doi: 10.1108/APJIE-02-2024-0036.
  43. Simões, F., & Marta, E. (2024). Public employment services and vulnerable youth in the EU: The case of rural NEETs. Politics and Governance, 12, article number 7432. doi: 10.17645/pag.7432.
  44. Turekulova, A., Mukhambetova, L., Chimgentbayeva, G., & Doshan, A. (2024). Social, labor, and economic behavior of young people in the context of the emergence of a digital society. E3S Web of Conferences, 537, article number 02026. doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/202453702026.
  45. Ufua, D.E., Emielu, E.T., Olujobi, O.J., Lakhani, F., Borishade, T.T., Ibidunni, A.S., & Osabuohien, E.S. (2021). Digital transformation: A conceptual framing for attaining Sustainable Development Goals 4 and 9 in Nigeria. Journal of Management & Organization, 27(5), 836-849. doi: 10.1017/jmo.2021.45.
  46. Vasilescu, D., & Sandroshvili, K. (2021). Youth unemployment and experiments for labor market inclusion: Perspective for youth in Moldova. Retrieved from https://ibn.idsi.md.
  47. World Bank. (2023). Safeguarding learning in Ukraine through digitalization and blended learning. Retrieved from https://documents1.worldbank.org.
  48. Yao, Q., Tang, H., Liu, Y., & Boadu, F. (2024). The penetration effect of digital leadership on digital transformation: The role of digital strategy consensus and diversity types. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 37(3), 903-927. doi: 10.1108/JEIM-09-2022-0350.
  49. Zancajo, A., Verger, A., & Bolea, P. (2022). Digitalization and beyond: The effects of COVID-19 on post-pandemic educational policy and delivery in Europe. Policy and Society, 41(1), 111-128. doi: 10.1093/polsoc/puab016.
  50. Zhang, L. (2023). The labor of reinvention: Entrepreneurship in the new Chinese digital economy. New York: Columbia University Press.
  51. Zhang, X., Xu, Y.Y., & Ma, L. (2023). Information technology investment and digital transformation: The roles of digital transformation strategy and top management. Business Process Management Journal, 29(2), 528-549. doi: 10.1108/BPMJ-06-2022-0254.

Suggested citation

Chechelashvili, M., Svanidze, A., Kavtidze, E., & Lagvilava, G. (2026). The impact of economic digitalisation on the development of government strategies for youth employment. Scientific Bulletin of Mukachevo State University. Series “Economics”, 13(1), 68-81. https://doi.org/10.52566/msu-econ1.2026.68